Test every agent.
Each agent has a Testing tab. Author eval cases (an input plus the expected result or a rubric), or let the platform draft them for you. Run the suite and read four signals, not a single green checkmark.

Every agent gets an eval suite: quality, consistency, cost, and latency, on cases you choose. Then Regisseur tells you the cheapest model that still passes the bar. For every agent.

Each agent has a Testing tab. Author eval cases (an input plus the expected result or a rubric), or let the platform draft them for you. Run the suite and read four signals, not a single green checkmark.

Run the same suite across every model you'd consider. Regisseur folds the results into a single model × {quality, latency, cost} matrix and stars ★ the cheapest configuration that PASSes, with ties broken by lower latency.
Unpriced models show a dash, never "$0"; a recommendation is only made among models that actually pass. Premium reasoning where the case is hard, a cheap fast model where it isn't. Chosen on evidence, not on vibes.
It is how you staff a team: the associate handles what the associate does well, the specialist is pulled in when complexity demands it, and the faster operator is used when speed is worth the extra cost. Regisseur applies that logic across models, and the matrix is the evidence for each choice.

Save a baseline. Every later run is rated pass / warn / fail against it across quality, rubric, cost, and latency.
A prompt tweak or model upgrade that quietly degrades quality, or balloons cost, is caught instead of shipping silently. A failing drift check can block the change.

A regulated vertical can run many specialized agents. Right-sizing each to the cheapest model that still passes, instead of stretching one expensive model across everything, is where quality holds and unit cost falls. It is the concrete mechanism behind the unit-cost half of an AI transformation.

Harvard Business Review (Mark Purdy, June 18 2026) argues the strongest agent teams are built from different models: when every agent runs on the same model, their errors correlate and blind spots compound. Two studies he cites, on diversity-selected agent teams were 25% better at resolving software-engineering problems than agents working individually, and just two diverse agents can “match or exceed the performance of 16 homogeneous agents.”
Regisseur operationalizes model diversity, and goes one step further: it tests every agent across models and assigns the cheapest one that still passes.
HBR · Purdy · June 2026 →Bring one agent and a handful of real cases. We'll author the suite, run it across models, and show you the matrix with the recommendation: quality, latency, and cost side by side.